|
Revision Introduction |
Writing a Research Paper
RevisionPeer editingNot only are the eyes of a peer great for catching blunders in final copy, but feedback from someone in your class is one of the best ways to revise either before or after you go over the copy yourself. The method described below has been adapted from Janet Giltrow's Academic Writing [1995] and is called the Think-Aloud or Reader-Response method. In this method, the reader reads your paper aloud while you sit alongside taking notes. You do not interject but simply record what your reader reports. Readers only come up with personal reactions and observations during the reading process; writers are the ones to flag problem areas for diagnosis. Only readers should speak. Good sections should also be commented upon. Here is a possible scenario between Suzy (reader) and Olga (writer):
Often, this process will simply confirm problems you already anticipated; other times, it will foreground areas overlooked in your own revising. The positive commentary of what the reader understands is also a great motivator that what you're saying is coming through. Peer Editing Guide from the Writer's Web is another way to approach the peer review process. |
|
owl home || writing lab and owl || handouts || workshops and presentations || internet resources This page is located at http://owl.english.purdue.edu/workshops/hypertext/ResearchW/peeredit.html
Copyright ©1995-2004 by OWL at Purdue
University and Purdue University. All rights reserved. |